{"id":541,"date":"2022-02-20T19:30:42","date_gmt":"2022-02-20T19:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/?p=541"},"modified":"2022-02-20T19:30:42","modified_gmt":"2022-02-20T19:30:42","slug":"dokazovanie-autenticity-katolickeho-krestanstva-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/2022\/02\/20\/dokazovanie-autenticity-katolickeho-krestanstva-2\/","title":{"rendered":"DOKAZOVANIE AUTENTICITY KATOL\u00cdCKEHO KRES\u0164ANSTVA"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignright size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"100\" height=\"99\" src=\"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/LOGO_GTF_2021-kopia-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-101\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>PERMANETN\u00c1 FORM\u00c1CIA ABSOLVENTOV TEOLOGICK\u00ddCH FAK\u00daLT&nbsp;<\/strong><br>doc. ThDr. \u0160tefan Palo\u010dko, PhD.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>T\u00c9MA II:<\/strong> DOKAZOVANIE AUTENTICITY KATOL\u00cdCKEHO KRES\u0164ANSTVA<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-text-color has-background has-black-background-color has-black-color is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u00daVOD: Nutnos\u0165 garancie autentick\u00e9ho tradovania kres\u0165anstva&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ke\u010f\u017ee kres\u0165anstvo je Bo\u017e\u00ed projekt na z\u00e1chranu \u010dloveka, nutne mus\u00ed by\u0165 funk\u010dn\u00fd. K funk\u010dnosti tak\u00e9hoto projektu je absol\u00fatne nevyhnutn\u00e9, aby sa t\u00e1to spr\u00e1vna interpret\u00e1cia kres\u0165anstva, kv\u00f4li jeho spr\u00e1vnej aplik\u00e1cii na praktick\u00fd \u017eivot \u010dloveka, dostala k tomuto \u010dloveku neporu\u0161en\u00e1. Tento Bo\u017e\u00ed projekt teda nutne mus\u00ed by\u0165 opatren\u00fd nejak\u00fdm prvkom, ktor\u00fd dok\u00e1\u017ee garantova\u0165 autentick\u00e9 odovzd\u00e1vanie kres\u0165anskej zvesti ostatn\u00fdm \u013eu\u010fom.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1. Krit\u00e9ri\u00e1 garanta autentick\u00e9ho tradovania kres\u0165anstva&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ost\u00e1va vyrie\u0161i\u0165 ot\u00e1zku, \u010do je t\u00fdm prvkom, ktor\u00fd dok\u00e1\u017ee autenticky garantova\u0165 neomyln\u00e9 tradovanie Kristovej n\u00e1uky. Pre rie\u0161enie tejto ot\u00e1zky musia existova\u0165 pravdivostn\u00e9 krit\u00e9ri\u00e1, ktor\u00e9 tak\u00fdto garant neomylnosti nutne mus\u00ed sp\u013a\u0148a\u0165. Ak nutne, nem\u00f4\u017eu to by\u0165 krit\u00e9ria, ktor\u00e9 s\u00fa subjekt\u00edvne vytvoren\u00e9. I platnos\u0165 krit\u00e9ri\u00ed mus\u00ed by\u0165 dok\u00e1zan\u00e1.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prv\u00fdm krit\u00e9riom je, \u017ee garant neomylnosti mus\u00ed by\u0165 verejne zn\u00e1my po\u010das celej hist\u00f3rie kres\u0165anstva. Toto krit\u00e9rium nutne mus\u00ed plati\u0165, preto\u017ee ak by garant nebol verejne zn\u00e1my, v praxi by to bolo rovnak\u00e9, ako by nebol. Mus\u00ed by\u0165 zn\u00e1my po\u010das celej hist\u00f3rie kres\u0165anstva, lebo ak by sa objavil a\u017e v priebehu kres\u0165anstva (napr. v 15. storo\u010d\u00ed), kres\u0165ania pred t\u00fdm by nemali mo\u017enos\u0165 dosta\u0165 sa k autentick\u00e9mu kres\u0165anstvu. (V tej dobe by bolo kres\u0165anstvo nefunk\u010dn\u00e9.)&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Druh\u00e9 krit\u00e9rium je, \u017ee garant neomylnosti mus\u00ed by\u0165 ustanoven\u00fd Bohom. Len Boh je toti\u017e prame\u0148om neomylnosti. Len jeho moc m\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 z\u00e1rukou, \u017ee je nie\u010do naozaj neomyln\u00e9.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tretie krit\u00e9rium je, \u017ee syst\u00e9m neomyln\u00e9ho garantovania autenticity kres\u0165anskej zvesti mus\u00ed by\u0165 minim\u00e1lne teoreticky funk\u010dn\u00fd. Ak ani len teoreticky nem\u00f4\u017ee fungova\u0165, nem\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 prav\u00fdm garantom neomylnosti.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2. Kritick\u00e9 zhodnotenie hypotetick\u00fdch garantov neomylnosti&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prv\u00e9 krit\u00e9rium zo v\u0161etk\u00fdch mo\u017enost\u00ed vyselektuje len troch kandid\u00e1tov. Len tri syst\u00e9my po\u010das celej hist\u00f3rie kres\u0165anstva boli verejne zn\u00e1me ako tak\u00e9, ktor\u00fdm ur\u010dit\u00e1 skupina kres\u0165anov pripisuje neomylnos\u0165 pri tradovan\u00ed kres\u0165anskej vierouky: P\u00e1pe\u017esk\u00fd syst\u00e9m, syst\u00e9m v\u0161eobecn\u00fdch koncilov nez\u00e1visle na p\u00e1pe\u017eovi a z\u00e1sada Sola Scriptura.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pou\u017eit\u00edm druh\u00e9ho krit\u00e9ria v \u010fal\u0161om kroku mo\u017eno zisti\u0165, \u017ee ani pri jednom z t\u00fdchto kandid\u00e1tov na garanta neomylnosti nie je mo\u017en\u00e9 s absol\u00fatnou istotou potvrdi\u0165, ale ani vyvr\u00e1ti\u0165, \u017ee tento garant je ustanoven\u00fd Bohom. Na tomto stupni dokazovania je nutn\u00e9 necha\u0165 obe mo\u017enosti pri v\u0161etk\u00fdch kandid\u00e1toch zatia\u013e otvoren\u00e9.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tretie krit\u00e9rium vedie k potvrdeniu zistenia, \u017ee p\u00e1pe\u017esk\u00fd syst\u00e9m je kontinu\u00e1lny rad p\u00e1pe\u017eov. T\u00edto p\u00e1pe\u017ei z \u010dasu na \u010das vyhlasovali defin\u00edcie, o ktor\u00fdch tvrdili, \u017ee s\u00fa neomyln\u00e9. I ke\u010f to v tomto kroku pozn\u00e1vania nemo\u017eno overi\u0165, faktom je, \u017ee tieto vierou\u010dn\u00e9 defin\u00edcie, teda dogmy, si nikdy v hist\u00f3rii neodporovali. Dve odporuj\u00face si dogmy by nutne znamenali, \u017ee minim\u00e1lne jeden p\u00e1pe\u017e sa zm\u00fdlil. Ak sa v\u0161ak zm\u00fdlil jeden, spochybnen\u00ed s\u00fa v\u0161etci. Syst\u00e9m by bol potvrden\u00fd ako nefunk\u010dn\u00fd. Nikdy sa v\u0161ak v hist\u00f3rii nestalo, \u017ee by si dogmy odporovali. I ke\u010f na tomto stupni dokazovania nemo\u017eno potvrdi\u0165, \u017ee dogmy s\u00fa neomyln\u00e9, nemo\u017eno to ani s istotou vyvr\u00e1ti\u0165. Mo\u017eno teda uzavrie\u0165, \u017ee p\u00e1pe\u017esk\u00fd syst\u00e9m je minim\u00e1lne teoreticky funk\u010dn\u00fd.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Druh\u00fdm hypotetick\u00fdm garantom neomylnosti je syst\u00e9m v\u0161eobecn\u00fdch koncilov nez\u00e1visle na p\u00e1pe\u017eovi. V prvom tis\u00edcro\u010d\u00ed ve\u013ek\u00fdch cirkevn\u00fdch zhroma\u017eden\u00ed, ktor\u00e9 rie\u0161ili vierou\u010dn\u00e9 ot\u00e1zky, bolo minim\u00e1lne 11. V\u0161etky si n\u00e1rokovali na to, \u017ee s\u00fa v\u0161eobecn\u00fdmi koncilmi. Tieto koncily si v\u0161ak vz\u00e1jomne odporovali, teda ide o prvok, ktor\u00fd sa u p\u00e1pe\u017eov nestal. Ak si koncily odporuj\u00fa, evidentne nem\u00f4\u017eu ma\u0165 v\u0161etky pravdu. Ak maj\u00fa koncily str\u00e1\u017ei\u0165 prav\u00e9 kres\u0165anstvo, mus\u00ed by\u0165 mo\u017en\u00e9 neomylne vytriedi\u0165 spr\u00e1vne od nespr\u00e1vnych. Na to je v\u0161ak potrebn\u00e1 neomyln\u00e1 norma, ktorou mo\u017eno pos\u00fadi\u0165, ktor\u00e9 koncily s\u00fa spr\u00e1vne. Pod\u013ea syst\u00e9mu koncilov nez\u00e1visl\u00fdch od p\u00e1pe\u017eov v\u0161ak \u017eiadna vy\u0161\u0161ia neomyln\u00e1 norma od koncilov neexistuje. Ak e\u0161te aj najvy\u0161\u0161iu normu je treba pos\u00fadi\u0165, syst\u00e9m kolabuje, ani len teoreticky nem\u00f4\u017ee fungova\u0165. Ako nefunk\u010dn\u00fd, nutne nem\u00f4\u017ee poch\u00e1dza\u0165 od Boha. T\u00fdm sa vyrie\u0161ilo uzavretie druh\u00e9ho krit\u00e9ria. Syst\u00e9m v\u0161eobecn\u00fdch koncilov nesp\u013a\u0148a ani druh\u00e9 ani tretie krit\u00e9rium.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Z\u00e1sada Sola Scriptura znamen\u00e1, \u017ee jedine Biblia je prostriedkom na neomyln\u00e9 odovzd\u00e1vanie autentickej kres\u0165anskej&nbsp;zvesti. Pri sk\u00faman\u00ed jej funk\u010dnosti je nutn\u00e9 vzia\u0165 do \u00favahy sp\u00f4sob, ako Biblia v hist\u00f3rii vznikla. Prv\u00e9 tri storo\u010dia si kres\u0165ania medzi sebou vymie\u0148ali len jednotliv\u00e9 spisy, ktor\u00e9 pova\u017eovali za posv\u00e4tn\u00e9. Spisy p\u00edsali apo\u0161toli, ich \u017eiaci, zbo\u017en\u00ed veriaci,&nbsp;i heretici. V ur\u010ditom \u010dase bolo potrebn\u00e9 rozhodn\u00fa\u0165, ktor\u00e9 spisy sa maj\u00fa \u010d\u00edta\u0165 na bohoslu\u017eb\u00e1ch, lebo s\u00fa in\u0161pirovan\u00e9,&nbsp;a ktor\u00e9 sa \u010d\u00edta\u0165 nemaj\u00fa, lebo s\u00fa oby\u010dajn\u00e9, naivn\u00e9, alebo dokonca heretick\u00e9. Spisy Nov\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona boli do podoby s\u00fa\u010dasnej k\u00e1nona prv\u00fdkr\u00e1t v hist\u00f3rii zosumarizovan\u00e9 a\u017e v roku 367 alexandrijsk\u00fdm patriarchom Atan\u00e1zom. Ak m\u00e1 by\u0165 t\u00e1to zbierka biblick\u00fdch kn\u00edh neomyln\u00e1, ba dokonca za jedin\u00fa neomyln\u00fa normu autentick\u00e9ho kres\u0165anstva, znamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee pri jej zostaven\u00ed nemohlo d\u00f4js\u0165 k omylu. Pri roztrieden\u00ed spisov m\u00f4\u017ee d\u00f4js\u0165 k absol\u00fatnej bezchybnosti jedine vtedy, ak sa to rob\u00ed pod\u013ea neomylnej normy. Ke\u010f\u017ee spr\u00e1vne zostavenie zoznamu posv\u00e4tn\u00fdch spisov samo potrebuje neomyln\u00fa normu, ktor\u00fa z\u00e1sada Sola Scriptura z defin\u00edcie neprip\u00fa\u0161\u0165a, nem\u00f4\u017ee ani len teoreticky fungova\u0165. T\u00fdm z\u00e1sada Sola Scriptura nepre\u0161la tret\u00edm krit\u00e9riom a tak nevyhnutne nepre\u0161la ani druh\u00fdm, ke\u010f\u017ee nefunk\u010dn\u00fd syst\u00e9m nem\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 od Boha.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Z\u00c1VER&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>P\u00e1pe\u017esk\u00fd syst\u00e9m prv\u00e9 krit\u00e9rium sp\u013a\u0148a, druh\u00e9 mo\u017eno sp\u013a\u0148a, tretie sp\u013a\u0148a.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Koncily prv\u00e9 krit\u00e9rium sp\u013a\u0148aj\u00fa, druh\u00e9 nesp\u013a\u0148aj\u00fa, tretie nesp\u013a\u0148aj\u00fa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sola Scriptura prv\u00e9 krit\u00e9rium sp\u013a\u0148a, druh\u00e9 nesp\u013a\u0148a, tretie nesp\u013a\u0148a.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cel\u00e9 dokazovanie je postaven\u00e9 na fakte, \u017ee nejak\u00e9ho garanta neomylnosti Boh ustanovi\u0165 nutne musel. Jedin\u00fd garant, ktor\u00fd by mohol by\u0165 Bohom ustanoven\u00fd, je p\u00e1pe\u017esk\u00fd syst\u00e9m. Ak nejak\u00fd by\u0165 mus\u00ed, a jedine p\u00e1pe\u017estvo to by\u0165 m\u00f4\u017ee, nutne z toho vypl\u00fdva, \u017ee p\u00e1pe\u017estvo t\u00fdm garantom by\u0165 mus\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NA\u0160A \u00daLOHA:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Utvrdzovanie sa v autentickosti katol\u00edckeho kres\u0165anstva na z\u00e1klade relat\u00edvne \u013eahko dostupn\u00fdch d\u00f4kazov.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u00daLOHA CIRKVI:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Utvrdzovanie kres\u0165anov v pravej viere a budovanie ekumenizmu v duchu Druh\u00e9ho vatik\u00e1nskeho koncilu, ktor\u00fd zamietol falo\u0161n\u00fd irenizmus, ktor\u00fdm sa nar\u00fa\u0161a \u010distota katol\u00edckeho u\u010denia a zatem\u0148uje sa jeho prav\u00fd a nepochybn\u00fd zmysel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-text-color has-background has-black-background-color has-black-color is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>LITERAT\u00daRA:&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DUS, J. A. \u2013 POKORN\u00dd, P.: <em>Nezn\u00e1m\u00e1 evangelia, Novoz\u00e1konn\u00ed apokryfy I.<\/em>Vy\u0161ehrad: 2001.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PASTOR AETERNUS, dogmatick\u00e1 kon\u0161tit\u00facia Prv\u00e9ho vatik\u00e1nskeho koncilu o Kristovej Cirkvi. In: BARON, A. \u2013 PIETRAS, H.: <em>Dokumenty sobor\u00f3w powszechnych, tom IV. <\/em>Krak\u00f3w: Wydawnictwo WAM, Ksi\u0119\u017ca Jezuici, 2005.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PALO\u010cKO, \u0160.: <em>Katol\u00edcka Cirkev ako prostriedok z\u00e1chrany \u013eud\u00ed. <\/em>Pre\u0161ov: Petra, 2007.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POSP\u00cd\u0160IL, C. V.: J<em>e\u017e\u00ed\u0161 z Nazareta, P\u00e1n a Spasitel. <\/em>Kosteln\u00ed Vyd\u0159\u00ed: Krystal OP, Karmelit\u00e1nsk\u00e9 nakladatelstv\u00ed, 2006.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PERMANETN\u00c1 FORM\u00c1CIA ABSOLVENTOV TEOLOGICK\u00ddCH FAK\u00daLT&nbsp;doc. ThDr. \u0160tefan Palo\u010dko, PhD.&nbsp; T\u00c9MA II: DOKAZOVANIE AUTENTICITY KATOL\u00cdCKEHO KRES\u0164ANSTVA \u00daVOD: Nutnos\u0165 garancie autentick\u00e9ho tradovania kres\u0165anstva&nbsp; Ke\u010f\u017ee kres\u0165anstvo je Bo\u017e\u00ed projekt na z\u00e1chranu \u010dloveka, nutne mus\u00ed by\u0165 funk\u010dn\u00fd. K funk\u010dnosti tak\u00e9hoto projektu je absol\u00fatne nevyhnutn\u00e9,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-palocko"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"featured-blog-large":false,"featured-blog-medium":false,"featured":false,"featured-blog-medium-small":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"RobertMacej","author_link":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/author\/robertmacej\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"PERMANETN\u00c1 FORM\u00c1CIA ABSOLVENTOV TEOLOGICK\u00ddCH FAK\u00daLT&nbsp;doc. ThDr. \u0160tefan Palo\u010dko, PhD.&nbsp; T\u00c9MA II: DOKAZOVANIE AUTENTICITY KATOL\u00cdCKEHO KRES\u0164ANSTVA \u00daVOD: Nutnos\u0165 garancie autentick\u00e9ho tradovania kres\u0165anstva&nbsp; Ke\u010f\u017ee kres\u0165anstvo je Bo\u017e\u00ed projekt na z\u00e1chranu \u010dloveka, nutne mus\u00ed by\u0165 funk\u010dn\u00fd. K funk\u010dnosti tak\u00e9hoto projektu je absol\u00fatne nevyhnutn\u00e9,","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=541"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":542,"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541\/revisions\/542"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/permanentnaformacia.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}